Overview

PFAS is now restricted in apparel and textile products in states like California and New York.

Enforcement is occurring at the point of sale.

But a critical gap remains:

There is currently no standardized requirement for PFAS compliance documentation at the point of import.

This means goods can:

• Enter the United States
• Move through ports in regulated states
• Reach the market

Without ever being required to prove compliance.

---

The Enforcement Reality

Imports are controlled by U.S. Customs and Border Protection

CBP already has authority to:

• Request compliance documentation
• Detain shipments
• Refuse entry for non-compliant goods

This is standard for:

• Lead in children’s products
• Forced labor violations
• Restricted chemicals

PFAS does not require new infrastructure to be enforced at ports.

It requires one thing:

A clear expectation that documentation must be provided.

---

The Gap

State agencies such as:

• California Department of Toxic Substances Control
• New York State Department of Environmental Conservation

Have defined what cannot be sold.

But there is no aligned requirement that:

These same goods must prove compliance before entering the country.

Result:

• Enforcement is delayed
• Risk is transferred to retailers and consumers
• Non-compliant goods can circulate freely until challenged

---

Why This Matters

Without import-level verification:

• “PFAS-free” claims remain unverified
• Compliant brands are undercut by undocumented goods
• Consumers have no reliable way to assess safety

This is not a manufacturing gap.

It is a documentation and enforcement gap at entry.

---

Directive: Consumer Pressure Can Close This Gap

This issue can move faster than legislation if agencies are forced to answer a simple question:

What documentation is required to prove PFAS compliance before goods enter U.S. markets?

Consumers can trigger that pressure by asking directly.

---

Step 1: Contact Federal Import Authority

Agency: U.S. Customs and Border Protection

Website Contact: https://www.cbp.gov/contact

What to Ask (Copy/Paste):

I am a consumer concerned about PFAS in clothing and textile products.

Several states, including California and New York, have restrictions on PFAS in apparel.

What documentation does CBP currently require to verify that imported textile goods comply with these regulations before they are released into the United States?

If no documentation is required, how does CBP prevent non-compliant goods from entering regulated markets?

---

Step 2: Contact Product Safety Enforcement

Agency: U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission

Website Contact: https://www.cpsc.gov/About-CPSC/Contact-Information

What to Ask (Copy/Paste):

I am requesting clarification on PFAS compliance in consumer textile products.

Are PFAS-regulated textiles being evaluated under existing consumer product safety frameworks?

Will documentation or certification requirements be implemented to verify compliance for imported goods before they reach consumers?

---

Step 3: Contact State Regulators (Where PFAS Is Already Restricted)

California:

California Department of Toxic Substances Control
https://dtsc.ca.gov/contact/

New York:

New York State Department of Environmental Conservation
https://dec.ny.gov/about/contact-us

What to Ask (Copy/Paste):

Your agency has established restrictions on PFAS in textile and apparel products.

What documentation is required to verify that imported goods comply with these regulations before they enter the state through U.S. ports?

Are you coordinating with federal agencies to prevent non-compliant goods from entering regulated markets?

---

Step 4: Ask Brands and Retailers Directly

Consumers can also shift pressure upstream.

What to Ask (Copy/Paste):

Can you provide documentation verifying that this product is PFAS-compliant, including third-party lab testing and supplier declarations?

If this product is imported, was compliance documentation required before it entered the U.S.?

---

Step 5: Create Visibility

• Share responses publicly
• Document non-answers
• Compare agency positions

The goal is not confrontation.

The goal is consistency.

---

What This Pressure Does

When these questions are asked at scale:

• Agencies are forced to define expectations
• Gaps between state law and import enforcement become visible
• Documentation requirements begin to formalize

This is how other regulated goods moved from:

• Voluntary compliance
  to
• required documentation at entry

---

PFAS PASS Position

PFAS PASS™ exists to fill the gap identified in this case:

• No standardized documentation system
• No consistent verification method
• No bridge between lab data and enforcement

By structuring compliance documentation and verification pathways, PFAS PASS provides a framework that can support:

• Import-level review
• Retail verification
• Consumer transparency

---

Conclusion

The system to stop non-compliant goods at ports already exists.

What is missing is the requirement to prove compliance.

If documentation becomes expected, enforcement becomes immediate.

Consumers have the ability to accelerate that shift by asking the right questions to the right agencies.

---

---